Skip to main content

Qui Tam Action

Whistleblowers — tell your story. Find justice.

Our attorneys have worked both for and with the Federal Government, and have helped dozens of whistleblowers come forward with the truth.

Free confidential evaluation

A whistleblower is often at the heart of stories that expose wrongdoing.

When a whistleblower files suit (a “qui tam action”), the lawsuit remains a secret. It’s kept under seal until the government can perform an investigation. Whistleblowers can be entitled to monetary rewards because they expose wrongdoing, aid an investigation, and should be compensated for their role in recovering illicitly obtained funds.

When we take on a whistleblower case, we become experts in our clients’ field so that we can be creative and bold advocates for them and for the truth.

We have experience with the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Stark Law, and we can help clients take advantage of fraud-fighting programs by the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

False Claims Act

The False Claims Act (FCA) allows the federal government to financially reward brave citizens who blow the whistle on companies that submit fraudulent claims. The FCA allows private parties to file qui tam actions that allege defendants have defrauded the federal government. The term qui tam is a Latin expression, which means “he who brings a case on behalf of the King, as well as for himself.” This means that the “relator,” or person who brings a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the government, can receive up to 30% of the recovered award. In the past three decades, the federal government has recovered billions of dollars in lost government money with the help of qui tam whistleblowers.

Stark Law

The Stark Law, as it is known, prohibits a physician from referring a Medicare or Medicaid patient to an entity with whom the physician or their immediate family member has a financial relationship. This financial relationship can include not only an ownership interest, but also a compensation scheme or even an agreement to pay the physician amounts far exceeding market value for their services. This law applies only to physicians and only to certain designated health services including:

  • Clinical lab services
  • Therapy services and supplies (physical, occupational, speech, radiation)
  • Imaging services (ex: radiology)
  • Medical equipment and nutrients (parenteral and enteral)
  • Prosthetics, orthotics and prosthetic devices
  • Home health services
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services and prescription drugs

The law also prohibits the organization providing these services from seeking payment from Medicare or Medicaid for services given as a result of a prohibited referral. There are some exceptions to this general rule.

For those services above, a doctor cannot refer a patient to receive the service at an organization in which he or his family has a financial stake, and thus stands to benefit from. The flip side of that is the organization is not allowed to seek Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement for services arising from that referral.

Violations of the Stark Law most commonly come from compensation agreements rather than ownership agreements. Some examples are conspiracies between entities and physicians for laboratory services. Providers and physicians have also been found liable for compensating doctors for cancer medications.

The penalties for physicians and companies that violate the Stark Law can be incredibly costly:

  • The provider and physician may be forced to refund the amount
  • The provider can face a civil fine of $15,000 for each service, including a civil assessment of three times the amount claimed
  • The physician or entity may also be excluded from claiming anything from Medicare or Medicaid going forward
  • The physician and provider can be held liable under the False Claims Act (FCA).

Plain violations of the Stark Law do not require an intent to break the law. However, for civil monetary penalties, program exclusion, civil assessments, and False Claims Act Liability, the violation must have been done knowingly.

Anti-Kickback Statute

The Anti-Kickback Statue (AKS) is somewhat similar to the Stark law. The AKS prohibits offering, receiving, paying, or soliciting anything of value to induce or reward referrals or generate Federal healthcare business.

For example, in a kickback, also known as a bribe, the organization pays a provider to either refer a patient or purchase a piece of equipment and then seeks reimbursement from the federal government. The organization attempts to initiate a transaction that will increase profit. Other examples of kickback include:

  • Conduct like paying individuals to recruit homeless patients whose services would be charged to Medicaid
  • Kickbacks to hospitals in the form of rebates for medical devices
  • Agreements between providers, like an orthopedic and a physical therapist, to refer patients to one another in return for a percentage of the amount collected from the government
  • The fraudulent leasing of medical equipment as a way for a hospital to pay a doctor for referrals

The AKS is worded very broadly and is often wielded against hospitals, medical device companies, other healthcare entities, and even physicians.

The civil penalties for violations of the AKS are very similar to those for violations of the Stark Law except that the violator can be hit with a fine of $50,000 for each violation. Violators of the AKS are still subject to the False Claims Act. However, unlike the Stark Law, violators of the AKS can be criminally liable for fines up to $25,000 and up to a five-year prison sentence for each violation.

When you should contact a Whistleblower Attorney

Employer may be engaging in Medicare fraud.

The government relies on whistleblowers and the False Claims Act to uncover Medicare qui tam fraud, and it can take many forms.

Employer is getting a kickback.

Those with knowledge of kickbacks, or bribes, by healthcare providers are in a unique position to protect vulnerable patients.

Government contractor is overcharging.

The United States government’s demand of goods and services is high, which is why the United States government relies on contractors for business support.

Suspicious coding for medical services.

The United States Attorney General has estimated that Medicare fraud amounted to between $60 and $90 billion per year.

Why PriceArmstrong

  • Specialized in representing whistleblowers
  • Proven success in complex litigation
  • Uniquely client-focused
Contact us

Ashley Monk
Client Relations Manager

Oscar M. Price, IV
Attorney

Attorney Graham Cotten

Graham Cotten
Attorney

Whistleblowers can receive significant monetary rewards for reporting fraud and misconduct.

521bn

Federal government loses per year from fraudulent schemes

279m

Largest Whistleblower award Securities and Exchange Commission

30%

Whistleblower awards can be up to 30%, when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million

Protection & Rewards

The False Claims Act.

The False Claims Act ensures that any whistleblower who brings claims exposing government fraud is protected. The Anti-Retaliation provision in the False Claims Act establishes that an employee, contractor, agent, or any other type of whistleblower which is employed by the company at issue cannot be retaliated against, or threatened for retaliation, for their actions.

Protection against Retaliation or Harassment.

Retaliation could take the form of harassment, dismissal, demotion or disciplinary measures. Harassment could also include such behaviors as failing to renew the contract of a whistleblower, withdrawing certain privileges (such as access to training), or the loss of responsibilities (marginalization).

Billions have been recovered. Up to 30% awarded.

In 2023 alone, whistleblowers helped the government recover $2.68 Billion. For their courage and assistance, a whistleblower can be awarded 15% to 30% of the amount recovered in their case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can anyone bring a qui tam or whistleblower action?

If you have specific information about a violation of the False Claims Act or government fraud, then you may bring a qui tam action, unless you are a current or former member of the Armed Forces or convicted of criminal misconduct involving the same misconduct. Even if you are a participant in the fraud, you are allowed to be a whistleblower. In fact, many whistleblower cases are brought by employees or contractors who discover fraud in the course of their employment.

What if I participated in the fraud?

If you unknowingly participated in the fraud, or were coerced by your employer to participate, your whistleblower case and potential compensation will not be impacted. If you knowingly participated in the fraud, consequences and potential earnings will be based on the level of your participation. Do not let your level of participation in the fraudulent activities stop you from contacting a lawyer – your case will remain sealed and confidential.

How are qui tam plaintiffs compensated?

Qui tam plaintiffs receive a percentage of the recovery in the qui tam action. This is usually between 15% and 25% if the government intervenes in the matter. If the government does not intervene, then plaintiffs may receive up to 30% of any recovery. Part of the role of your qui tam attorney should be to advocate for an appropriate compensation for any whistleblower.

How do I file a qui tam case?

A qui tam action is filed in the United States District Court off of the public record. Your qui tam attorney will be able to help you file your complaint and protect your rights during this time.

Will my qui tam case be sealed?

Under the False Claims Act, every qui tam lawsuit is initially filed “under seal” in federal court. This means that the identity of the whistleblower is protected from public disclosure for a period of time to allow the government to investigate the conduct alleged. If you file a qui tam case, this investigation period is crucially and it is important to have attorneys who are experienced and equipped to work in concert with the government.

Does it matter how quickly I file?

Yes, when you file your whistleblower lawsuit can be important, for at least two reasons. First, all claims under the False Claims Act are subject to a statute of limitations which can prevent recovery if a case is brought too late in some circumstances. Second, particularly for fraud that is widespread throughout a company, multiple cases may be filed by different whistleblowers. As the False Claims Act provides for the anonymity of whistleblowers to be protected during the investigation phase of qui tam cases, only the government may know of the extent of these filings. A “first to file” rule can apply which limits the role and recovery of any subsequent whistleblower who files after the first case.

Is government contractor fraud common?

Government contract fraud is more common than many believe. One of the primary examples of government contractor fraud comes from defense contractors. The U.S. spends hundreds of billions each year on our national defense. Some of the ways defense contractors attempt to perpetrate fraud on the federal government include:

  • Inflating the charges and costs of items;
  • Violating the Truth-in-Negotiations Act;
  • Providing military items which fail to conform to the original contract;
  • Improperly allocating costs;
  • Improperly substituting products;
  • Cross-charging;
  • Price-fixing;
  • Collusion and bid-rigging;
  • Overcharging for materials, labor or supplies, and
  • Falsifying information to convince the government to agree to a contract.

Reach out and take advantage of our free case evaluation.

All your communications with PriceArmstrong will be kept confidential and, if we take your case, there are no-out-of pocket costs to you.